FARO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Itron has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 10.78%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.41%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.38 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.716%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is lower than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Itron's PE ratio is 21.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.39x versus 2.17x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 13.02%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.1%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.41%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $179.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.45%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.426%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $169M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 47.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.39x versus 5.75x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of --. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.41%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.39x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $44.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.41%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.53%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.487, which suggesting that the stock is 48.713% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.223, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.711%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.9M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Faro Technologies's net income of $906K is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 93.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 2.39x versus 17.12x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.